MasterLoquillo
by on December 14, 2012
241 views
I am kind of on the fence on this particular subject. The facade that this time of year represents the birth of the holiest of figures to the Christian world has all but been exposed. Exploited, really. It is most likely that the truth behind December 25th, lies in the fact that the day in question was actually the largest pagan holiday, and as a way of stifling practicing pagans, Christians commandeered aforementioned date, and gave it another purpose.

Consequently, as with so many other things that have evolved since biblical times, so has the motivation for Christmas. The celebration of the birth of a savior has been essentially molded into a commerce driven frenzy of retailers peddling their wares upon droves of people, feeling guilted if they do not participate in the shopping craze.

My question is : since the Bible does not recognize homosexual activity as acceptable behavior, are faggots entitled to reap any benefits of the season? There is specific notation, somewhere in the Old Testament, that "man shall not lay with man, as he lay with woman" or something to that effect. To my personal knowledge, most devout followers do not feel that faggots even have the right to identify themselves as Christians, in the first place. With that being said, the only practical use I can find for fags, under these circumstances, is to drain their bank accounts. Channel their funds out of rebellion to those that hate them. Don't spend your money with retailers who truly do not accept you. Send it to those that tolerate you for what you are. Either way, you are a financial slave. At least by boycotting the retailers, and serving as you are supposed to, your earnings will not go to waste, or be spent in vain.
Be the first person to like this.